LASER PROCESS ENGINEERING / MULTI-MACHINE

Groove Geometry Lab v2.1

← CNCPlot Studio
⚙ Machine settings ▾ · Rated power, wavelength, optical transmission & parameter limits

Wavelength and pulse width are recorded machine metadata, not used as unjustified depth-correction factors. Configure optical diameter on each workspace. Set each input's allowed range below. Machine limits apply to both tabs; changing a value in one tab never changes values in the other.

ParameterMinimumMaximum

Generic profile · configure to match your machine's actual limits.

Model validity: XY positions, hatch interval and nominal pulse pitch follow the entered parameters exactly. Groove width and depth are model results, not measured machine predictions: the documents do not specify the required stainless-steel ablation threshold, effective penetration depth, beam-profile calibration or laser power curve. Calibrate from a measured single-line groove before using depth values for decisions. The Default preset reflects the uploaded screenshot, not a validated machining recommendation.
—speed ÷ frequency
—Ø100 µm reference
—J/cm²
—µm | 4-line section
—µin | unfiltered geometry

01 — Cross section / front view

4 indexed scan lines · perpendicular to travel

02 — Plan view / pulse map

Same four X positions and lateral scale as cross section
Single-track footprint width²—
Line-to-line spacing—
4-line deepest point²—
Pulse-to-pulse distance—
Ablation model not validated. Horizontal positions in both views use the same scale; vertical groove depth is exaggerated for readability.

Equations, definitions & limitations

Read before interpreting depth
Modeled eroded profilePulse / dimensionsOriginal surface / optical outline

Exact commanded geometry: line centers are separated by fill interval s; pulse centers along each line are separated by p = v / f (mm, with f in Hz). Nominal 2D spot overlap is 1 − s/D, clamped to 0% for non-overlapping spots. Repetition repeats the entire pattern; it does not change XY spacing.

E_p = P_avg / f [J/pulse] F₀ = 2E_p / (πw²) [J/cm²] F(x,y) = F₀ exp[-2(x²+y²)/w²] d_pulse(x,y) = δ · max{ln[F(x,y)/F_th], 0} d_total(x,y) = repetitions × Σ(scan lines) Σ(pulses) d_pulse(x,y) D_crater = w √(2 ln(F₀/F_th)), when F₀ > F_th

Here w is the 1/e² beam radius (assuming your 0.100 mm optical diameter is specified on that basis), δ is an experimentally fitted effective depth coefficient, and F_th is an experimentally fitted ablation threshold. The per-pulse depth law is zero below the threshold. The browser sums the contributing discrete pulse positions around the displayed section; it does not invent a semicircular cross section. Ra is calculated by numerical integration of the displayed centerline geometry across the middle two hatch pitches, without ISO profile filtering or real material microtexture.

Important physical assumptions and uncertainties

Constant average-power scaling from the configured wattage to the software percentage; Gaussian beam with a known 1/e² diameter; identical pulses and identical pass alignment; constant fluence threshold and δ; linear summation of removed depth per pulse. These assumptions omit power-vs-setting calibration, beam quality, wavelength-dependent absorption, transient heat transfer, incubation, redeposition, plasma shielding, melting and re-solidification, material change, defocus, hatch-border effects, laser acceleration, controller pulse-phase, and 3D workpiece geometry. Actual grooves may have raised lips and a materially different width or depth. A one-line depth measurement fits δ only at the tested settings; it does not validate extrapolation.

Sources and supporting documentation

Uploaded laser marking software manual: pp. 3-21 (power, speed, frequency, defocus, repetition), 3-23 to 3-26 (fill interval/hatch), 3-53 to 3-54 (deep-dig and fill settings). Uploaded 13 W laser datasheet: output 13 W, 1064 nm, Q-switch 1–400 kHz, 2 µm marking resolution (which is not depth resolution). Uploaded laser technical guide, p. 4: qualitative influence of processing parameters.

Scientific Reports (2018), Gaussian-beam crater diameters and ablation-model validation.

Optics Express (2014), pulse incubation and heat accumulation in stainless steel.

Scientific Reports (2026), logarithmic vs more complex ablation depth models for stainless steel (ultrafast regime).

Machines (2026), classic logarithmic ablation law and extended modeling.

¹ Average power is nominally set to configured wattage × configured efficiency × power percentage. Real power versus setting can be nonlinear. ² The browser's geometrical output is conditional on unverified model coefficients until calibrated. It is not a certified surface roughness, an ablation depth specification or a laser safety assessment.

Standalone offline HTML5 · SVG + JavaScript · No libraries, remote code, telemetry, or device control · Always operate the Class 4 laser using the manufacturer’s interlocks and approved enclosure.